Free shipping on orders over 19,990 Ft via Packeta, Fox Post Box, and DPD Collection Point

Check order status

Become part of a community of book lovers from all over the world and get access to a whole bunch of benefits. Create an account for free

Free delivery for purchases over 19 990 Ft

DPD point 990 Ft DPD courier 1 190 Ft GLS point 1 190 Ft Hungarian Post 1 795 Ft Hungarian Post 1 690 Ft Hungarian Post 1 690 Ft FoxPost 1 190 Ft Packeta point 1 190 Ft GLS courier 1 690 Ft

Contact

How to shop

Help

My account

▸ Empty :-(

Free shipping on orders over 19,990 Ft via Packeta, Fox Post Box, and DPD Collection Point

Quantum Labyrinth

Name: Quantum Labyrinth
Brand: Springer
SKU: 05323322
Price: 59222 HUF
Availability: InStock
Author: D. J. Hoekzema
ISBN: 9789401047814

D. J. Hoekzema

Language

English

Book Paperback

Libristo code: 05323322

Publishers Springer, October 2012

At the outset of the research leading to this book I held a position somewhere close to 'the standar... Full description

Libristo code: 05323322

406 b

59 222 Ft

In stock at our supplier Shipping in 5-8 days

Up to 30 days for returns

Customers also purchased

Olympia und seine Festspiele Karl Hachtmann

Paperback

8 638 Ft

Idę do szkoły. Litery. Karty do kaligrafii z pisakiem suchościeralnym praca zbiorowa

Paperback

2 918 Ft

Das große Buch für Akkordeon, m. 1 Audio-CD Herb Kraus

Hardback

9 808 Ft

111 Orte im Elsass, die man gesehen haben muss Barbara Krull

Paperback

5 942 Ft

El ladino Manuel Alvar López

Paperback

5 969 Ft

GER-DEUTSCHE ENTOMOLOGISCHE ZE Gesellschaft Iris Zu Dresden

Paperback

9 881 Ft

At the outset of the research leading to this book I held a position somewhere close to 'the standard Copenhagen interpretation' of QM. I was strongly attracted to, in particular, the philosophy of Niels Bohr. However, being aware of some of the problematic sides and ambiguities of his views and of new developments which have taken place in QM after his time, the main challenge would be to develop a more up to date version version of his approach and express it in a philosophically unobjectionable way. Traces of this original attitude can still be found in views I hold nowadays. For instance, I think that I now know a satisfactory and correct way of dealing with features like 'complementarity', and I still see this as a relevant subject. In many other respects, however, there have been major changes in my position. In fact, during certain stages of my research my views simply started moving and kept on doing so at an irritating pace and for uncomfortably long periods of time. I learned, for example that at least some of the classical ideas about theory structure are much better than I had realized, and cannot just be pushed aside for anything even as impressive as empirical success.